tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31841111.post115862524095402998..comments2007-04-13T00:14:44.348+01:00Keithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15590254264130144028noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31841111.post-1161159771007523022006-10-18T09:22:00.000+01:002006-10-18T09:22:00.000+01:00Thanks jb3 - its such a good subject you raise I am going to start a separate post on this.Keithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15590254264130144028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31841111.post-1161124057492843782006-10-17T23:27:00.000+01:002006-10-17T23:27:00.000+01:00The blog in theory works, but should companies be able to edit the content of the blog especially if problems or issues with a product or service are real?JB3http://www.blogger.com/profile/15404352783625937629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31841111.post-1161123987929296112006-10-17T23:26:00.000+01:002006-10-17T23:26:00.000+01:00The blog in theory is effective, but what about companies dictating the content of the blog? Is that ok especially if someone is posting real problems or outcomes from using the product or service.JB3http://www.blogger.com/profile/15404352783625937629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31841111.post-1161123920186607132006-10-17T23:25:00.000+01:002006-10-17T23:25:00.000+01:00It can do all those great things, but the problem as I see it is, if companies control the content of a blog. What if someone is posting legitimate problems or outcomes with a product or service? Should the company be allowed to erase that from their blog?JB3http://www.blogger.com/profile/15404352783625937629noreply@blogger.com